Services

One architecture, applied as advisory and as engineering.

Every engagement traces back to the same underlying model: orchestration, retrieval, model routing, and verification, wrapped in observability. How much of that we build for you — versus advise you on building yourself — depends on where you sit on the ladder below.

In plain terms

AMEA (Autonomous Micro-Enterprise Architectures) is the technical side — how to structure AI agents so a small team can run what used to need a much larger one.

AMEE (Autonomous Micro-Enterprise Economics) is the financial case for doing it — why the coordination cost and risk of that architecture is lower and more predictable than the traditional alternative.

A third, AdTech-specific paper applies the same framework directly to programmatic clearing — OpenRTB, IAB compliance, and bid-stream verification.

AMEG (Autonomous Micro-Enterprise Governance) formalizes the governance layer directly: verification, audit trails, and accountability, mapped to regulatory frameworks as they develop globally — the EU AI Act being the most developed example today.

A fifth paper, AMEF (Autonomous Micro-Enterprise Finance), addresses how investors and capital allocators should price and underwrite these firms — replacing metrics like burn multiple and revenue-per-employee with ones built for compute-and-verification-driven organizations. Everything on this page is one of the five, applied.

AMEA / AMEE advisory — service ladder

From a two-week diagnostic to an ongoing build-out.

  • 01

    AMEA Growth Audit

    A structured gap-analysis of your current operating model against the AMEA framework — where headcount is standing in for orchestration, where verification is missing, and what growth path actually exists. For an established business, that's usually a 3–4x path; for a startup or early-stage company with no legacy process to unwind, it can be considerably higher — 50–100x isn't unusual. The audit is the fastest way to find out which applies to you.

  • 02

    Transformation Architecture Design

    We translate the audit into a practical operating blueprint: which functions move to agent orchestration, what data and retrieval layer they need, and what governance has to sit in front of them before anything goes live.

  • 03

    Implementation & fractional advisory

    Ongoing engagement where we help build out the agreed architecture — using the same open-source, self-hostable stack described below — and stay on as a fractional advisor as the system, and the organization around it, matures.

Engagement scope and duration are set per client.

15 minutes — we'll tell you honestly if this is a fit before anything else.

How it's actually built

A six-stage production architecture, not a demo.

Every deployment we build runs the same request lifecycle: intake, agent reasoning, retrieval, model routing, output validation, and delivery — a finite-state machine gated by deterministic verification DAGs, where every state transition must pass an invariant check before it commits. Observed end to end, and packaged to ship as one repeatable unit per client.

1. Intaken8n 2. ReasoningLangGraph 3. Retrievalpgvector 4. ModelgatewayLiteLLM 5. ValidationGuardrails 6. Deliveryn8n
StagePrimary toolPurpose
1. Intaken8nReceive, authenticate, validate, and classify the incoming request.
2. ReasoningLangGraphDecide what the request needs and orchestrate the steps to get there, with full state control.
3. RetrievalpgvectorFetch relevant context or memory, with source metadata attached for citation.
4. Model gatewayLiteLLMRoute the completion to Gemini, Groq, or a self-hosted model — with automatic fallback.
5. ValidationGuardrails AICheck structure, factual consistency, and safety before anything is released.
6. Deliveryn8nDeliver the validated response back through the original channel.

Cross-cutting: Langfuse traces cost, latency, and failure across every stage; the whole stack ships as one Docker/Kubernetes template per client. Every tool is open-source and self-hostable — deliberately, so data-residency requirements (including EU AI Act readiness) don't force a rebuild later.

Why this doesn't just move the cost around

A model call is the expensive option — we treat it that way.

Replacing headcount with agent orchestration only works if the new cost is genuinely lower and bounded. If every step in the process routes through a large model regardless of whether it needs to, the business hasn't cut cost — it's just swapped a labor bill for a token bill, and one that can grow just as unpredictably. Our architecture is built specifically to avoid that.

  • Deterministic logic first, the model last

    In the IVT plugin, for example, a risk verdict is decided entirely by rule-based scoring blended with a lightweight anomaly-detection model — no LLM call in that path at all. A model is only invoked afterward, optionally, to turn an already-decided verdict into a human-readable explanation. If that call fails or times out, the verdict still returns. The model never sits on the critical path where a cheaper method would do.

  • Routing to the cheapest sufficient model

    LiteLLM picks a model per request based on what the task actually needs — a frontier model for genuinely hard reasoning, a smaller or self-hosted open-weight model (via vLLM) for high-volume, low-complexity calls. Most requests in a production system are the latter, not the former.

  • Retrieval instead of bigger prompts

    pgvector fetches only the relevant context for a given request instead of stuffing everything into the prompt. Smaller, targeted context windows mean fewer tokens per call, consistently, not just when someone remembers to optimize it.

  • Validation to avoid paying twice

    Guardrails AI catches malformed or failed outputs before they reach the client — the alternative is a silent re-ask loop that quietly doubles or triples the token spend on a single request without anyone noticing until the bill arrives.

  • Cost visible on every request, not just the invoice

    Langfuse logs token count, cost, and latency per call. That means compute spend is a monitored, bounded line item from day one — not something discovered after it's already scaled past the point of being fixable.

This is also part of what we check for in an AMEA Growth Audit: whether a proposed AI system is actually cheaper to run than the process it replaces, once every model call is accounted for — not just cheaper in headcount.

Applied AdTech AI

AI-first, not AdTech-first.

Hands-on experience running real-time DSP/SSP and OpenRTB infrastructure gives us an unusually direct proving ground for agentic AI specifically — not tooling in general. Three AI-native plugins are already live in production, with two more completing testing and shipping within weeks — all built on the same architecture above, and available through our engineering practice at reviveadservermod.com. Our third working paper benchmarks this approach directly against traditional ad-operations workflows — see Insights for the results.

  • IVT / Fraud Detection

    Real-time invalid-traffic scoring on the bid path — rule-based weighted signals blended with an unsupervised anomaly layer, returning a Clean / Suspicious / Blocked verdict fast enough not to add latency to serving.

  • AI Analytics Copilot

    A conversational front door to campaign data — plain-English questions answered from live metrics and campaign documents together, with every answer traceable back to its source.

  • RTB Intelligence Engine

    Analysis across bid requests and responses — win rate, latency, timeout rate, and floor-price impact — surfaced as a plugin rather than a separate reporting stack.

  • Banner Ad Generator

    Plain-English creative briefs turned into finished, pixel-exact banner ads across every standard IAB size, with instant revisions.

In focus: the MCP natural-language database agent

This is our clearest example of what "AI-first" means in practice. Instead of a person writing SQL, or a chart dashboard someone has to learn, a team member simply asks a question in plain English — the agent discovers the actual database schema itself, generates a read-only query against it, and answers in plain English. It never receives write access or database credentials, and every query is logged for audit.

Plain-Englishquestion Schemadiscovery Read-only SQLquery generated Database(read-only) Plain-Englishanswer

Built on MCP (Model Context Protocol), with Gemini or Groq as the reasoning layer — the same request-validation and audit logging used across our production architecture applies here too.

Open standards work

AdContext Protocol (AdCP)

We've contributed to AdCP, an open standard for agent-to-agent advertising workflows — letting an advertiser's AI agent and a publisher's AI agent discover audiences, negotiate pricing, and activate a campaign directly, with every interaction logged and auditable. It's a working example of agentic commerce, built on the same orchestration and verification principles behind our AMEA advisory practice — and a concrete case study for what "agentic AI in production" looks like outside a slide deck.

See it in a case study